She
does not identify as Mexican or American. Eloisa Tamez is Lipan
Apache and her ancestors owned this land a century before the war
that imposed the boundary between Mexico and Texas.
This Week's Circulars
Now
a hulking border wall crosses her backyard, something she says feels
like a "violation."
That
part of her property, in the border town of El Calaboz in the far
south of Texas, is a vacant area split down the middle by the rusty
iron fence, which stands 18 feet (5.5 meters) high.
Since
it was impossible to build the wall in the middle of the Rio Grande
River, which marks the natural border with Mexico, US federal
authorities built it a couple miles (kilometers) north of the
riverbank.
That
meant some of the lands through which the wall already passes -- and
will continue to be built, if President Donald Trump gets his way --
are owned by native tribes and private farmers.
This
is what happened almost 10 years ago to Tamez, a nursing professor at
the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley and a tribal rights
activist.
"It
makes me very sad to see what happened to my property, which was
valued by my parents not for the money, but for what the land
produced for us, because my father was a farmer," the
83-year-old told AFP.
©
Provided by AFP
Part of the border wall in the Rio Grande Valley Sector, near
McAllen, Texas
Referring
to the land, she said: "They violate it. It's very sad to see
that happening and I'm glad that my parents didn't live to see it."
When
federal authorities installed their fence, they divided her land not
exactly in half.
Then
they gave her a key to open the gate that allows her to access the
other side of her ancestral land, three acres (1.2 hectares) of
desert dotted with cactus and mesquite.
That
is all that is left of the 12 acres that once belonged to their Lipan
Apache ancestors since the 18th century, thanks to a land grant from
the Spanish crown.
In
2009, after losing a US federal lawsuit, Tamez was forced to accept
compensation of $56,000, which she donated to nursing scholarships on
behalf of her parents.
Other
farmers, whose lands were entirely to the south of the wall, also
received access codes to their properties.
But
most of the cases were settled with appropriations from the federal
government for values that averaged $12,600, according to an
investigation by National Public Radio.
Such
land appropriations could multiply if Trump succeeds in walling most
or all of the border, a third of which already has fencing.
©
Provided by AFP
A US Border Patrol agent keeps watch at a gate on the US-Mexico
border fence near San Benito, Texas
More
than half of the 310,531 illegal migrants detained by US Customs and
Border Patrol in the fiscal year that ended on September 30 were
captured in Texas, official figures show.
That
is why the family separation of migrants that attracted international
attention in the last two months had its epicenter in this state,
particularly in the Rio Grande Valley region where Tamez lives.
It
is home to the largest detention center for undocumented migrants and
asylum seekers (nicknamed "Ursula," with more than a
thousand detainees) and the "Casa Padre" shelter for
minors, a former Walmart box store with a capacity to hold about
1,400 children.
©
Provided by AFP
Captured undocumented immigrants walk past a stretch of border levee
wall while being taken into custody by Border Patrol agents on
February 22, 2018 near McAllen, Texas
Since
May, more than 2,300 children were separated from their parents or
guardians when they were detained while crossing the border,
illegally or seeking asylum, under President Donald Trump's "zero
tolerance" policy.
While
Trump ordered on June 20 to end family separations, 2,000 children
remain alone in "processing centers" and shelters.
"The
current migration crisis is the result of the inability of Congress
to enforce the law for decades," Tamez said.
An
immigration reform bill that included the president's proposal for a
$25 billion wall that would dissect nearly 2,000 miles (3,200
kilometers) of the border failed again Wednesday in Congress.
"The
loss of our lands to build a wall is a Band-Aid on the migration
crisis, not the solution," said Tamez. "Congress has not
been able to govern as it should, instead they are playing politics.
"It
is not the first time that they violate our rights by taking away our
land," the native activist continued, evoking an appropriation
that took place in 1936.
And,
if the Trump plan is successful, it will not be the last.
No comments:
Post a Comment