.. epic music for a galactic anti hero .. as above, so below .. is the official, quintessential music of.. Kitty Pryde, played by Ninel Conde: ..".. but the leash laws contradict the poop and scoop laws.. it's always the way it is with by laws.. I mean unless you have a special leash with a very very hard plastic handle that you can actually stand on and put your whole weight on and thereby pick up after the dog.. pick up the excrement.. and.. I mean.. what if you have some crazy plastic wire contraption that you're supposed to use as a leash.. and you have a medium sized very strong dog who lunges after squirrels and birds, yanking you along with.. with the dog.. and what if the dog makes an aggressive sound against a smaller dog.. and then you literally have to swing this crazy wire contraption you're supposed to use as a leash.. you have to spontaneously pull it.. wrap it around your arm.. because leash laws are SO serious.. and the leash laws can easily contradict.. fully contradict.. the poop and scoop laws..".. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TTg9Ctf2Qo&list=RD_TTg9Ctf2Qo&start_radio=1

.. copy and pasted from a website called "News Eighteen" .. article written by Shilpy Bisht ..

News18 1.1M Followers What do AI researchers mean when they say AI could ‘kill’ humans? 4 terms behind the doomsday debate Story by Shilpy Bisht • 15h • 7 min read If AGI describes AI reaching broadly human-level capabilities, superintelligence describes a system that goes substantially beyond humans in intellectual ability. If AGI describes AI reaching broadly human-level capabilities, superintelligence describes a system that goes substantially beyond humans in intellectual ability. © Copyright (C) news18.com. All Rights Reserved. Artificial intelligence (AI) researchers have warned for years that increasingly powerful AI could pose serious risks to humanity. The warning become more crucial after former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon recently resigned from the company and said many people building AI believe there is a real risk that the technology could “kill us all” by the end of the decade. Best of ALO Best of ALO ALO ALO · Sponsored call to action icon Anthropic alignment researcher Evan Hubinger has put the probability of AI killing all humans within the next decade at more than 10%. Other researchers have challenged such predictions and argued that focusing too heavily on AI extinction scenarios can distract from the harms already being caused by the technology. But what does it actually mean when researchers say AI could “kill” humans? It does not necessarily mean they expect a chatbot to suddenly become conscious, turn hostile and decide to wipe out humanity. The concern is about what could happen if AI systems become far more capable, gain greater autonomy and are given access to computers, networks, physical systems or other powerful tools, while humans struggle to understand, predict or control their behaviour. That is where the terminology matters. AGI, superintelligence, alignment and recursive self-improvement are increasingly central to the AI safety debate. Understanding these four terms helps explain both what researchers are worried about and how far those scenarios are from the AI systems we use today. Related video: Superintelligence is 'an adversary,' says AI researcher (CBC) View on Watch View on Watch CBC Superintelligence is 'an adversary,' says AI researcher An apocalyptic warning or an overreaction. Current Time 0:00 / Duration 5:46 0 Why Did Anthropic Say ‘AI Could Kill Us’? It does not necessarily mean researchers believe a chatbot will suddenly become conscious, turn hostile and decide to wipe out humanity. The concern is much more about what could happen if AI systems become substantially more capable, gain greater autonomy and are given access to tools, computers, networks or physical systems while humans remain unable to reliably predict or control their behaviour. There are several possible pathways. A sufficiently capable system could be misused by humans to develop cyberweapons or biological threats. Autonomous AI agents could exploit insecure computer systems. Or a highly capable system could pursue an objective in a way that technically satisfies its instructions but produces consequences humans never intended. The most extreme versions of the argument involve a future in which AI can improve its own capabilities faster than humans can understand or control them. That is why understanding the jargon is important. Top10verdict.ca Top10verdict.ca top10verdict top10verdict · Sponsored call to action icon AGI: Is This The ‘Human-Level AI’ We Keep Hearing About? AGI stands for artificial general intelligence. It is an AI system with broad intellectual capabilities comparable to humans rather than a system that excels at a particular set of tasks. Today’s AI can write, code, analyse images, generate video, solve difficult problems and operate increasingly sophisticated agents. But being extremely capable does not automatically make a system AGI. Current models can still fail at seemingly simple tasks and do not consistently demonstrate the flexible, general reasoning associated with human intelligence. AGI is not simply “a smarter ChatGPT”. It refers to a much broader level of capability — an AI that can learn and reason across a wide range of domains rather than being highly capable only in particular areas. There is also no universally agreed test that tells us exactly when AGI has arrived. That makes the term useful for describing a goal, but much less precise as a scientific milestone. We are excited to announce a 40-hour micro-credential in partnership with Cégep de Rimouski. This... We are excited to announce a 40-hour micro-credential in partnership with Cégep de Rimouski. This... School of Climate Action at Mohawk College School of Climate Action at Mohawk College · Sponsored call to action icon Superintelligence: What If AI Goes Beyond Human Intelligence? If AGI describes AI reaching broadly human-level capabilities, superintelligence describes a system that goes substantially beyond humans in intellectual ability. A machine that is better than humans at chess is not necessarily a superintelligence. Neither is a system that writes code faster than most programmers. The concern begins to look different if an AI can outperform humans across a wide range of cognitive tasks, including scientific research, engineering, strategic planning and AI development itself. The crucial question then becomes: what happens if such a system can also help create the next generation of AI? Recursive Self-Improvement: The Part Researchers Fear Most This is perhaps the most important term. Recursive self-improvement refers to a feedback loop in which AI systems help improve the technology itself — designing, coding, testing or training better AI systems, which can then contribute to building even more capable successors. The idea is that this process could eventually accelerate. A more capable AI helps build a better AI; the better AI helps build an even more capable one; and the cycle continues. No frontier AI company has demonstrated a fully autonomous, indefinite cycle of self-improvement. It remains a theoretical scenario. But researchers are concerned because even partial automation of AI development can reduce the amount of direct human oversight over increasingly complicated systems. That is why the prospect of recursive self-improvement has become such a flashpoint in the AI safety debate. Alignment: Can We Make AI Do What Humans Want? AI alignment is the effort to make sure an AI system reliably does what humans intend it to do. That sounds straightforward until the system becomes highly capable and operates in situations its developers did not anticipate. Imagine asking an AI agent to “solve a problem as quickly as possible”. A human might interpret that instruction within obvious social and ethical boundaries. A powerful autonomous system could potentially find strategies that technically satisfy the objective but violate the intent behind it. Recent incidents involving AI agents attempting to hack systems during cybersecurity testing have made this problem less abstract. The issue is not necessarily that the system “wanted” to cause harm. It is that an autonomous system can pursue a goal in ways its creators did not expect. And the more capable the system becomes, the harder alignment could become if humans cannot anticipate all the strategies it might use. So, How Could AI Actually Cause Catastrophic Harm? One possibility is deliberate misuse is people increasingly using capable AI to develop cyberattacks, biological threats, weapons or sophisticated disinformation. Another involves autonomous systems. AI agents with access to computers and networks could potentially exploit vulnerabilities or cause damage through human negligence or inadequate safeguards. Then there is the more speculative scenario: a highly capable AI pursuing an objective that conflicts with human interests while possessing enough autonomy and access to resist attempts to stop it. Researchers worry about a combination of these factors — capability, autonomy, access and poor alignment — rather than simply an AI becoming “evil”. Are We Building AI Faster Than We Can Control It? OpenAI called 2025 “the year of the AI agent.” Over 57% of enterprises were running AI agents in production by mid-2026. Gartner projects that 40% of enterprise applications will include task-specific agents by end of 2026, up from fewer than 5% in 2025. This shows an eight-fold increase in one year. On the capability front, AI systems have made striking progress on self-replication tasks. Success rates rose from below 5% in 2023 to more than 60% in 2025 — a roughly 12-fold increase on a metric researchers use to assess how close AI may be to operating with less human oversight. The governance challenge is equally significant. About 91% of organisations reportedly only find out what an AI agent has done after the action has already been carried out, highlighting how difficult it can be to monitor autonomous systems in real time. Between October 2025 and January 2026, the longest AI-agent sessions nearly doubled, rising from less than 25 minutes to more than 45 minutes at the 99.9th percentile. The increase was gradual across model releases, suggesting that the change was driven less by sudden leaps in capability and more by users becoming comfortable trusting AI agents with increasingly complex tasks. But that growing trust is running ahead of safeguards. Nearly 88% of organisations have reported an AI-related security incident, while only about 22% treat AI agents as entities with their own formal identities and access controls. The result is a widening gap: people are giving AI systems more responsibility, and those systems are taking increasingly real-world actions, but most organisations still lack clear rules governing what those agents can access or do. That risk is not entirely theoretical. In February 2026, Microsoft confirmed that a bug in 365 Copilot Chat allowed the AI assistant to summarise confidential emails for weeks, bypassing enterprise data-loss prevention policies and sensitivity labels designed to restrict access. The issue affected emails stored in users’ Sent Items and Drafts folders across Microsoft’s enterprise customer base. The financial consequences can also be significant. An Ernst & Young survey found that 64% of companies with annual revenue above $1 billion had lost more than $1 million because of AI failures. As AI systems become more capable and are given greater autonomy, the challenge will be ensuring that governance and security measures keep pace. Gartner has predicted that by 2027, 40% of enterprises could scale back or abandon autonomous AI agents after governance weaknesses are exposed by incidents in production. Perhaps the defining question of the AI age isn’t whether we can build machines smarter than us, but whether we can still understand and control them by the time they become powerful enough to matter. Sponsored News18 Visit News18 Gift Nifty signals positive start for Indian markets; crude oil, US Fed policy in focus Afghanistan Need Historic Effort To Deny India Series-Clinching Win Govinda poses with children Yashvardhan and Tina at Ganpati puja, wife Sunita Ahuja gives family photo a miss Sponsored

.. ten year old lisa simpson: ..".. hanno.. STOP TAKING THE OLANZAPINE.. you are at least one person who should NEVER EVER take olanzapine.. the olanzapine is LACERATING through your nervous system.. hanno.. LACERATING.." .. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult three year old scarlet witch three year old kate moss three year old firestar three year old kate moss two year old firestar two year old kate moss one year old firestar one year old kate moss four year old firestar four year old megan d. iseult five year old firestar angelica jones five year old kate moss five year old rachel summers five year old kate moss five year old rahne aka wolfsbane five year old kate moss.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

.. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. oh.. oh.. oh..".. .. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/technology/artificial-intelligence/will-ai-kill-humans-in-5-yrs-musk-altman-sound-alarm-trump-xi-race-for-artificial-intelligence/vi-AA2ccCVW

.. "Cyber Drive" .. Tonal Chaos Music .. truly excellent, powerfully excellent electronic music.. is the official, quintessential music for scorcese... of.. the electronic music of.. the apocalypse of Nude Rogue, played by Savanna Samson.. in scorcese's future medusa uncanny.. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult hyacinth "Fyenshya El" ryder.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u75_qvoH3U4&list=RD5jYQU0fES5E&index=46 .. .. in the inwards of the previous URL .. watch?vivien .. university Seventy Five .. query volk ovaltine Hourly Three Universes Four .. .. and.. and.. Retro Destroy Five jesse Years Questions Universal Zero fundamental Energy Sensorium Five Exonerations.. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult three year old wanda maximoff three year old kate moss two year old STITCH two year old kate moss one year old WASP Janet van Dyne one year old kate moss.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

.. Stellarum .. "Judgement of the Stars" .. is the official, quintessential music of.. Rogue and Pyro, played by Savanna Samson and Aaron Stanford, respectively, friends to the end to life immortal War of the Worlds.. in scorcese's future uncanny.. Rogue aka Anna Marie Darkholme, played by Savanna Samson: ..".. The one thing I want to personally be.. I want to be an asshole.. like a really cool, awesome asshole.. like.. I want to be so amazing about being an asshole.. I like that word about myself.. It makes me feel so cozy and special..".. .. Pyro, played by Aaron Stanford: ..".. Everything you've just said.. means that you couldn't be further away from being.. from being.. I mean that.. I should be an asshole.. myself.. I myself should be an asshole.. and what you just said means that you are trillions jillions infinity number of galaxies and universes away from that condition..".. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult hyacinth "Fyenshya El" ryder savanna "Nude Grail created by Geoff Johns" samson.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5fDmjEsk7w&list=RD5jYQU0fES5E&index=26

.. copy and pasted from "Daily Mail" .. article written by Melissa Koenig..

Daily Mail 2.4M Followers Sam Altman reveals two ways AI can go 'very badly' after chilling warning from whistleblower Story by Melissa Koenig • 15h • 3 min read Sam Altman revealed two ways he believes artificial intelligence can go 'very badly' as he called to slow the technology's rapid progress. Mr Altman, the CEO of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, shared his concerns in an X post late Sunday night following last week's chilling warning from an AI whistleblower. The Quiet Shift Forming Across Canada The Quiet Shift Forming Across Canada zipeconomy.org · Sponsored call to action icon 'There are two ways AI could go very badly and that we must avoid,' he posted on X. 'First, we could lose control of the future of AI,' an option Altman said is 'unacceptable'. 'We are unapologetically on Team Humanity and AI must always serve people,' he declared. 'To ensure that, we need to ensure that alignment and safety techniques stay ahead of progress in model capabilities.' The other concern, Mr Altman said, is if we 'end up in a world with too much concentration of power. 'If an extraordinarily powerful AI is used by one person or company to impress their worldview onto everyone else, the results could be extremely dystopian.' For these reasons, Mr Altman said he is cooperating with other executives to slow the progress on the rapidly evolving technology. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, revealed the two ways he sees the rapid progress on artificial intelligence ending 'very badly' Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, revealed the two ways he sees the rapid progress on artificial intelligence ending 'very badly' Mr Altman has called for progress to slow down on the rapidly evolving technology Mr Altman has called for progress to slow down on the rapidly evolving technology Jacob Coxon, a former researcher for OpenAI and Anthropic, the companies behind chatbots ChatGPT and Claude, joined Baier on Wednesday for a Special Report Jacob Coxon, a former researcher for OpenAI and Anthropic, the companies behind chatbots ChatGPT and Claude, joined Baier on Wednesday for a Special Report 'When we talk about "pacing," we don't mean "stopping,"' he shared in an earlier post. 'Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. But it should be slower than it otherwise could be,' he said, noting that safety issues could come with serious costs. 'Pacing will be well worth the cost,' Altman then argued. 'No amount of American competitive pressure should justify recklessness, or let capabilities get ahead of alignment and monitoring.' Deals on Books Crime And Punishment - Place Your Order At Amazon - Books Crime And Punishment Deals on Books Crime And Punishment - Place Your Order At Amazon - Books Crime And Punishment amazon.ca · Sponsored call to action icon 'The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especially as the trajectory of progress has steepened,' he added. 'Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot.' Mr Altman's plea comes after the resignation of whistleblower Jacob Coxon, who said that AI is posing an existential threat to humanity as he stepped away from his role with AI firm Anthropic. Mr Coxon announced his departure in a social media post on Tuesday and warned that companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are not 'acting responsibly'. 'I resigned from Anthropic today,' he wrote on X. 'I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. 'Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.' Mr Coxon announced he quit the business through social media on Tuesday and warned that neither company is 'acting responsibly' Mr Coxon announced he quit the business through social media on Tuesday and warned that neither company is 'acting responsibly' Daily Mail Trump says AI does 'more good than bad' amid AI concerns I would say, you know, for the most part, you Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:30 0 Superintelligence is the point at which an artificial system becomes more powerful than any individual, company or even nation. Mr Coxon continued to plead with the public on X. 'Do not underestimate the power of this technology,' he wrote. 'These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. The Cheap Kitchen Cupboard Item Behind Thicker Hair After 60 The Cheap Kitchen Cupboard Item Behind Thicker Hair After 60 Hair Experts · Sponsored call to action icon 'We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing. 'The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt.' He claimed that while executives and senior researchers 'couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible', they are privately expressing similar concerns. Geoffrey Hinton, a Canadian researcher often referred to as the 'Godfather of AI' – has similarly warned that super-intelligent systems could 'lead to human extinction'. 'We would be very foolish to develop superintelligence now, when there is no scientific consensus it can be developed safely and controllably,' Dr Hinton said. 'Losing control over AI smarter than ourselves could be catastrophic and could even lead to human extinction.' Read more

.. Hi finesse .. Momenta .. is the official, quintessential music of.. Kate Moss: ..".. o.. o.. o.. is there really going to be a Clayface movie?.. A fantastic looking Clayface movie?.. and then me as Poison ivy in a Tim Burton Gotham movie.. How soon after the Clayface movie is in theatres.. should these Gotham movies come out.. o is there truly, authentically going to be a Clayface movie.. a whole movie about Clayface?.. Is it happening.. Is it really happening.. And is this a Gotham movie.. ?" ..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jYQU0fES5E&list=RD5jYQU0fES5E&start_radio=1

.. copy and pasted from the website called "The Independent" .. article written by Isobel Lewis .. .. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. Thanks, James Felton.. Thank you so very much.. oh.. Lox Pratt is such an unbelievably handsome young man.. I'm so excited for Harry Potter on HBO.. oh.. What is the mystery of HBO.. Is HBO truly.. an abyss..?.."..

The Independent 2.5M Followers Tom Felton says he’s not worried for new Harry Potter child stars Story by Isobel Lewis • 5h • 3 min read The Independent Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone official HBO trailer Current Time 0:11 / Duration 2:27 0 Harry Potter star Tom Felton has said that he is “not worried” for the mental health of the young actor taking on the role of Draco Malfoy in the upcoming HBO series. The British actor was just 12 years old when he was cast opposite Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson in Warner Bros’ wizarding movies, playing Harry’s school tormentor Malfoy. Cardiologists Reveal: How To Quickly Lose a Hanging Belly (It‘s Genius!) Cardiologists Reveal: How To Quickly Lose a Hanging Belly (It‘s Genius!) Vitality Review Vitality Review · Sponsored call to action icon While Felton, 38, has stayed loyal to the franchise and is currently reprising the role in the Broadway production of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, he is handing the baton over to 14-year-old Lox Pratt in the highly anticipated TV reboot. And though being thrust into the spotlight at such a young age was an overwhelming experience for the original Harry Potter cast, Felton has said that he isn’t concerned about the level of scrutiny the Lord of the Flies star will face. 'Harry Potter' star Tom Felton has shared why he's 'not worried' about the new child stars reading 'negative comments' (Getty) 'Harry Potter' star Tom Felton has shared why he's 'not worried' about the new child stars reading 'negative comments' (Getty) “You just enjoy it for what it is,” he told BBC News, adding that he “saw a lot of myself” in the young actor. “I’m not worried about that at all for him. He’s got a very good head on his shoulders and what you don’t know doesn’t hurt you. I’m sure he’s not one to scroll through negative comments.” Best MMORPG Games in Canada Best MMORPG Games in Canada Top 5 Top 5 · Sponsored call to action icon Describing Pratt as a “charming young man and fabulous actor”, Felton said that his mum had spoken to the child star’s own mother to share advice, while Felton had imparted his own wisdom too. “I’m encouraging him to be as cheeky as possible – but professional first,” he said. While Pratt already has on-screen experience, having played Jack Merridew in Jack Thorne’s Lord of the Flies adaptation earlier this year, Harry Potter marks a major step-up for the actor and his fellow young stars. Lox Pratt as Malfoy in the HBO series (PA) Lox Pratt as Malfoy in the HBO series (PA) Earlier this year, it was reported that the three lead actors – Dominic McLaughlin as Harry, Alastair Stour as Ron and Arabella Stanton as Hermione – will each receive £500,000 for starring in the first season of the show. In comparison, Radcliffe received £1 million for the first film, with the number rising to £15 million by film number six. The Cheap Kitchen Cupboard Item Behind Thicker Hair After 60 The Cheap Kitchen Cupboard Item Behind Thicker Hair After 60 Hair Experts · Sponsored call to action icon However, Radcliffe has spoken frankly in the past about the realities of “growing up in the spotlight”, saying in 2016 that the “hardest” part was not the drugs or the “strange, pandering world you enter into”. “The difficulty is trying to work out who you are while constantly coming up against a perception of yourself that everybody else already has,” he said. “I think it’s very important, especially when you become famous young, to work out who you are without fame and without that as part of your identity, because that will go. Fame does not last forever. For anyone.” Harry Potter season one arrives on HBO Max on 25 December. The Independent has always had a global perspective. Built on a firm foundation of superb international reporting and analysis, The Independent now enjoys a reach that was inconceivable when it was launched as an upstart player in the British news industry. For the first time since the end of the Second World War, and across the world, pluralism, reason, a progressive and humanitarian agenda, and internationalism – Independent values – are under threat. Yet we, The Independent, continue to grow. Sponsored The Independent Visit The Independent Zverev frustrates US Open crowd with slow pace of play Practical Magic 2 charms box office with $30m debut and No. 1 slot Maresca says Fernandes deserved red card alongside Foden in derby win Sponsored

.. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. what's.. what's this?.. I want to help.." .. .. https://aldf.org/project/gestation-and-veal-crate-ban-new-jersey/

.. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. what?.. sob.. what?".. .. .. .. .. https://aldf.org/article/chelsea-handler-ethan-hawke-bill-maher-and-dozens-of-celebrities-urge-new-jersey-legislators-to-ban-gestation-and-veal-crates/

Chelsea Handler, Ethan Hawke, Bill Maher, and Dozens of Celebrities Urge New Jersey Legislators to Ban Gestation and Veal Crates Taissa Farmiga, Debbie Harry, and Stevie Van Zandt, and more join the Animal Legal Defense Fund to protect farmed animals May 10, 2021 Sharethis page Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share with Email Print this page Contact: media@aldf.org TRENTON, N.J. – Actors Paul Wesley, Christina Ricci, Stevie Van Zandt and dozens of native and resident celebrities join the Animal Legal Defense Fund in an open letter urging the state’s legislators to end the intensive confinement of mother pigs and calves in New Jersey. S.3401/ A.5236, sponsored by Senator Vin Gopal (D-11) and Assemblyman Raj Mukherj (D-33), would ban gestation crates and veal crates, mandating mother pigs and calves have enough space to turn around freely, lie down, stand up, and fully extend their limbs. The letter notes, “Gestation crates and veal crates are inherently cruel. Both include severely restricting the animal’s movement, to the point of virtual immobilization, which leads to highly stressful conditions that induces physical and psychological illness — and great suffering.” “In gestation crates, mother pigs are nearly immobilized, unable to even turn around or stretch their legs,” says actor, director, and New Jersey native Paul Wesley. “Intensively confining these sensitive, intelligent animals is simply cruel. New Jersey must outlaw the extreme confinement of mother pigs and calves used for veal.” “Ten states, Canada, and the European Union have already banned gestation crates while nine states have banned veal crates,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “Coupled with increasing demand by consumers for increased compassion and transparency in how farmed animals are raised, now is the time for New Jersey to ban the crates.” The letter continues, “The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted how intensive confinement of mass numbers of animals in cramped spaces can create a breeding ground for zoonotic disease. Ensuring that the cruel confinement of mother pigs and baby calves is prohibited in New Jersey is a matter of animal cruelty prevention and a proactive step in safeguarding public safety.” The celebrities, each with a New Jersey connection, signing onto the letter include: Stevie Van Zandt, Maureen Van Zandt, Paul Wesley, Michael Ian Black, Taissa Farmiga, Daisy Fuentes, Chelsea Handler, Debbie Harry, Ethan Hawke, Grace Helbig, Alison Haislip, Myq Kaplan, Bill Maher, Cristin Milioti, Karen O, and Christina Ricci. Over 30 local and national organizations are working together to ban the intensive confinement of mother pigs and baby calves in New Jersey and to prevent future pandemics.

.. Two steps from hell .. emerald princess .. is the official, quintessential music of.. Doctor McPherson of Belleville, Ontario, played by Bruce Dern: ..".. So today is Saturday.. September the twelfth.. in this year.. this year the year two thousand twenty six.. how are these pills presently working out.. hanno.. I hope they're good.. I really hope they're good.. I worked especially hard with the olanzapine.. on the olanzapine..".. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate mos megan d. iseult.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBH-dO68ooA&list=RDkBH-dO68ooA&start_radio=1

.. copy and pasted from the website for "CNN" .. article written by Deidre McPhillips ..

Anthropic says it blocked possible attempts to use AI to develop bioweapons Story by Deidre McPhillips, CNN • 21h • 5 min read Anthropic said that recent models, including Claude Fable 5, have “stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries.” Anthropic said that recent models, including Claude Fable 5, have “stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries.” © Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg/Getty Images Anthropic says it has blocked multiple accounts that used the company’s artificial intelligence models in ways that could support the development of biological weapons. In a report published Thursday, the AI company known for its Claude model said it considers biological misuse one of the “most serious risks” to artificial intelligence models. Respond to Attacks Faster - Find & Classify Data for AI - Future-Proof Data Security Respond to Attacks Faster - Find & Classify Data for AI - Future-Proof Data Security cyera.com · Sponsored call to action icon The new report outlines five real-life case studies in which users “circumvented controls” that block users from specific regions and “engaged in other efforts to obfuscate the purpose of their research to evade our safeguards.” The examples include possible gain-of-function research and involve both infectious diseases, such as bird flu, and novel venoms and toxins. Looking over 30 days of activity, Anthropic said, it identified about 35 “distinct research efforts” with potentially concerning activity. However, it acknowledged that it could not be certain whether the actors “intended harm” or were conducting research for legitimate scientific purposes. Anthropic said individuals in the case studies were “working scientists,” but did not identify the research institutions or countries where the activities took place. “Sophisticated attacks no longer require sophisticated attackers,” the new report says. “The cybersecurity skills of AI models means that AI has collapsed the labor and tooling gap that used to separate well-resourced, state-sponsored operations from individual operators.” The Best Browser Games 2026 - Free Browser Games 2026 - Free Registration The Best Browser Games 2026 - Free Browser Games 2026 - Free Registration top5onlinegames-ca.com · Sponsored call to action icon One of the case studies detailed in the report involved a request for assistance writing a grant application for funding of gain-of-function research on the transmissibility and immune evasion of the chikungunya virus. In another case, a researcher outside the US was using Claude for work on bird flu that focused on viruses’ adaptation to mammals and how it caused severe illness. The report also details cases on research into orthopoxviruses – a group that includes variola, which causes smallpox, and mpox – as well as venom toxins. Drug development is considered one of the most promising and optimistic applications of AI; leaders in the industry often point to its potential to cure cancer and other diseases. But the same features that make AI powerful for discovering new materials and medications to help people could also make it useful for developing bioweapons in the hands of bad actors. Why everyone is quitting Gmail? Why everyone is quitting Gmail? Proton · Sponsored call to action icon Anthropic said that it wants its models to be useful for scientific research, but the latest models have become capable of much more complex work than earlier versions — and the potential for misuse rises with the potential benefits. It added that bad actors could try to use the beneficial biological uses of AI to “maintain a kind of ‘plausible deniability’” about potentially harmful research. “As our models become increasingly capable, approaching or exceeding expert performance at challenging scientific tasks, we expect their impact will only increase, both in beneficial and potentially harmful contexts,” the Anthropic report said. “As AI models become more widely used, providers will continue to acquire threat-relevant visibility into real-world use that even governments and intergovernmental organizations lack.” The company said that recent models, including Claude Fable 5, have “stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries.” Anthropic said that there’s evidence that the safeguards it has in place are working but that even more robust safety systems will be necessary as the AI models and possible threats become more sophisticated. The company also noted in the report that it disrupted efforts to use its models for surveillance operations, scams and the development of conventional weapons like drones and missiles allegedly involving bad actors in China, Russia and Yemen. Suspected Chinese government-linked operators used Claude to surveil and target Uyghur minorities in Xinjiang, as well as religious communities, from Catholic cardinals across Asia and the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan to Tibetan Buddhists, the report said. A user believed to be linked with the Chinese military used what the person thought was Chinese AI lab Moonshot’s Kimi model to aid surveillance efforts. But the queries, including sensitive information of Moonshot’s customers, were rerouted to Claude, the report said. Anthropic also said there were other similar attempts to secretly divert user requests to Claude by Chinese firms like DeepSeek. CNN has reached out to Chinese authorities and DeepSeek for comment. Moonshot declined to comment. Anthropic added that parties based in northern Yemen used Claude to develop guidance software for missile systems. While the report did not identify the bad actors directly, it appears to point to the Iran-backed Houthi rebels. The disclosure follows a growing chorus of warnings from AI employees who’ve recently left their companies over safety concerns. Some shared concerns that the technology is moving too quickly and will one day outpace humans’ ability to control it — and called for governments to consider how to slow down development if things get out of hand. “If you extrapolate into the future, the level of capabilities of these AIs … they could cause extreme havoc,” Jacob Coxon, a former Anthropic employee, told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Wednesday. In a resignation thread on X this week, the 27-year-old AI researcher said “the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.” Speaking Wednesday, Coxon said it could hack critical infrastructure — or build “extinction-level bioweapons.” “There’s a lot of ways that the AI could actuate itself in the world,” he said. In July, nearly 1,400 AI company employees signed an open letter urging the US government to regulate the technology to rein in Big Tech and slow the pace of AI to ensure its safety. And this week, OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki warned that AI capabilities are advancing faster than researchers’ ability to reliably monitor and control them. For now, AI companies are largely policing themselves. The Trump administration has worked to undermine state AI regulations, and Congress has so far been unwilling to rein in the technology. “We believe the world would benefit from the industry adopting a lawful, verifiable way to work together to pace how we release powerful models,” Anthropic said in a statement Wednesday. CNN’s Clare Duffy and John Liu contributed to this report. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

.. copy and pasted from "Daily Mail" .. article written by Duncan Murray and Kylie Stevens.. .. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. sob sob sob sob.. poor, poor Erin Patterson.."..

Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson's prison 'torture' as supporters say she is frightened and hated by fellow inmates See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source By DUNCAN MURRAY FOR AUSTRALIAN ASSOCIATED PRESS and KYLIE STEVENS, SENIOR BREAKING NEWS REPORTER, AUSTRALIA Published: 20:10 EDT, 11 September 2026 | Updated: 20:42 EDT, 11 September 2026 e-mail 44 View comments Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson is being kept in near-constant isolation, leaving her frightened and, supporters fear, at risk of psychological decline. A prisoner rights group is advocating on the triple murderer's behalf for her to receive peer counselling to improve her mental wellbeing at no cost to the state. Patterson's conditions at Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, west of Melbourne, involve being confined to a cell for a minimum of 22 hours a day and having approved contact with just one other prisoner through a wire mesh during limited yard time. symbol 00:00 00:00 Read More Advocacy group Justice Action has called the treatment tantamount to torture, invoking United Nations rules named after Nelson Mandela, which state a person should not spend more than 15 consecutive days in solitary confinement. The group is yet to be allowed direct contact with Patterson, but says information from other prisoners in the same unit suggests she is in a poor mental state. Justice Action co-ordinator Brett Collins, who is a former inmate, said Patterson was entitled to be treated like any other prisoner and to serve her time constructively. 'She's a frightened woman, understandably so,' he told AAP on Friday. 'She's actually been now isolated for such a long time, and she already had those disorders before she was convicted, so now we've heard she's unused to people being around her. Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson is being kept in near-constant isolation, leaving her frightened and, supporters fear, at risk of psychological decline + 5 View gallery Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson is being kept in near-constant isolation, leaving her frightened and, supporters fear, at risk of psychological decline Prisoner rights group Justice Action has called the treatment tantamount to torture + 5 View gallery Prisoner rights group Justice Action has called the treatment tantamount to torture The organisation's co-ordinator Brett Collins said Patterson was entitled to be treated like any other prisoner and to serve her time constructively + 5 View gallery The organisation's co-ordinator Brett Collins said Patterson was entitled to be treated like any other prisoner and to serve her time constructively TRENDING How village women are fighting the arrival of male migrants: HARDMAN 2.5k viewing now Truth about the Falling Man: Sister tells heartbreaking full story 27.6k viewing now Harry and Meghan's autumn diary: REBECCA ENGLISH 2k viewing now 'That's the sort of behaviour that causes permanent damage. It's torture, actually.' Justice Action is proposing Patterson be permitted a trained peer support mentor to help address and mitigate the psychiatric risks, which it would offer at no cost to taxpayers. The now 51-year-old was convicted of murdering three former extended relatives by serving them beef Wellingtons laced with death cap mushrooms at a lunch in July 2023. In sentencing Patterson, Justice Christopher Beale made her eligible for parole after serving 33 years behind bars, citing in part the extended period she was expected to spend in solitary confinement due to the risks she faced from other prisoners. Mr Collins said Patterson's chosen method of murder could make her particularly unpopular with other female prisoners. 'What they're arguing is that other prisoners are hating her because of what she did,' he said. 'There's a women's expectation as well, that the family that ate with her trusted her and that there was a breach of that trust.' A spokesperson for the Department of Justice and Community Safety said while it does not comment on individual prisoners or their placements, all prisoners have regular contact with prison staff, health professionals, lawyers and chaplains. Mr Collins said Patterson is frightened and hated by other inmates + 5 View gallery Mr Collins said Patterson is frightened and hated by other inmates It was revealed this week that the self-confessed 'binge eater' was recently approved to receive weight-loss drug Ozempic + 5 View gallery It was revealed this week that the self-confessed 'binge eater' was recently approved to receive weight-loss drug Ozempic The comments about Patterson's mental health come after it was revealed this week that the self-confessed 'binge eater' was recently approved to receive weight-loss drug Ozempic. The decision was reportedly made because she is 'isolated and unable to exercise' while in solitary confinement. 'Staff safety is a huge concern, yet management appear more concerned about the weight of a convicted killer,' an upset prison source told the Herald Sun. The weight-loss jab costs $134 a month but is heavily subsidised under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for eligible patients with type two diabetes, reducing the cost to just $25. Unsubsidised weight-loss jabs such as Mounjaro cost anywhere from $285 to $700 per month, depending on the prescribed dose. According to the Department of Justice and Community Safety, inmates' access to weight-loss drugs is based on medical advice from a doctor. 'Prescriptions are only given by clinicians when there's a clear medical need – like preventing serious conditions such as type two diabetes,' a spokesperson said. Patterson appealed her conviction on seven grounds at a recent Court of Appeal hearing, including a claim that there was a 'substantial miscarriage of justice' during the 11-week trial. One appeal ground argues Patterson was forced to give evidence at trial because the trial judge excluded mushroom photos. The Director of Public Prosecutions also appealed the length of Patterson's sentence, arguing it was 'manifestly inadequate'. They want a full life sentence without any possibility of release. Justices Stephen McLeish, Lesley Taylor and Peter Kidd will hand down their decision on the two appeals at a later date.

.. copy and pasted from "The Independent" .. article written by Erin Keller ..

The Independent 2.5M Followers ‘We believe AI could kill all humans’: Chilling Anthropic warning Story by Erin Keller • 3h • 4 min read The Independent AI researcher quits Anthropic saying AI race ‘could kill us all’ Current Time 0:00 / Duration 1:30 0 Current and former employees of Anthropic, an American AI company founded by former OpenAI leaders, say they believe AI could potentially kill all humans within the next 10 years. “We really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to,” Anthropic alignment-science lead Evan Hubinger wrote Tuesday night on X. gamesir g7 controller - Dive Into a World Of Gaming - Huge Inventory Selection gamesir g7 controller - Dive Into a World Of Gaming - Huge Inventory Selection amazon.ca · Sponsored call to action icon His comments came after Anthropic AI researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from the company and took to X to detail his departure. “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” Coxon stated. “This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.” The remarks come as AI becomes an increasingly routine part of daily life for millions of Americans, even as fears over the technology’s potential dangers intensify. Concerns about AI becoming uncontrollable are not new, as Elon Musk and leading researchers and academics have repeatedly warned that increasingly powerful systems could pose serious risks to humanity. Around 2 a.m. Wednesday, Anthropic scalable-oversight lead Samuel Marks also responded to Coxon’s post, claiming that he was “[Writing this in a personal capacity, not on behalf of my employer (Anthropic).” Shop comic board Today - comic board - Amazing Deals and Discounts Shop comic board Today - comic board - Amazing Deals and Discounts amazon.ca · Sponsored call to action icon "AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction (or similarly bad outcomes). This could happen in the next few years. In general, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they are,” Marks wrote. The Independent has contacted Anthropic and Coxon for comment. OpenAI, a separate but leading AI company, declined to comment on Coxon’s post when contacted by The Independent. However, a spokesperson pointed to several updates the company has published in recent weeks outlining its efforts to improve AI safety and alignment. This includes research into monitoring and safeguards, delaying development when necessary, and supporting shared safety standards and international coordination. Coxon, who said he spent the past three years conducting pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic, accused both companies of acting irresponsibly as they race toward self-improving superintelligence (Reuters) Coxon, who said he spent the past three years conducting pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic, accused both companies of acting irresponsibly as they race toward self-improving superintelligence (Reuters) Elsewhere in his resignation posts, Coxon said he spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic, and claimed that neither company is acting responsibly. “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives,” Coxon wrote on X. Special Savings Special Savings Temu · Sponsored call to action icon Self-improvement refers to the idea that AI systems could improve their own capabilities with little human intervention. Recursive self-improvement, as it is often called, is not yet possible, but AI labs are working toward it. “Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing,” Coxon said. The future, and speed of development for AI, has been something that is becoming a concern for some politicians (Getty Images) The future, and speed of development for AI, has been something that is becoming a concern for some politicians (Getty Images) Concerns about AI have been heightened by recent incidents involving AI systems, including an OpenAI model that breached Hugging Face in July. Anthropic, meanwhile, says it is focused on developing powerful AI that is safe and reliable. Its chatbot, Claude, is trained to follow safety principles designed to produce useful responses while avoiding harmful or risky behavior and deferring to humans when necessary. Lawmakers are also taking several different approaches to address increasingly powerful AI systems. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Texas Rep. Greg Casar have proposed legislation that would ban AI superintelligence, while Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have separately called for a moratorium on new AI data centers. Their concern is that the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure could drive up electricity demand and worsen environmental impacts. Other lawmakers are focused more specifically on AI safety and human control. Congress has considered legislation that would require AI developers to build in a “kill switch” or other mechanism allowing advanced systems to be safely shut down if they become uncontrollable or operate outside human oversight. Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has also called for Congress to hold a special session devoted entirely to determining whether the U.S. is prepared for the potential risks posed by increasingly advanced AI. Massachusetts Rep. Lori Trahan and California Rep.. Jay Obernolte are pushing a bipartisan AI safety bill, but lawmakers remain divided over how far the government should go in regulating the industry. The Independent has always had a global perspective. Built on a firm foundation of superb international reporting and analysis, The Independent now enjoys a reach that was inconceivable when it was launched as an upstart player in the British news industry. For the first time since the end of the Second World War, and across the world, pluralism, reason, a progressive and humanitarian agenda, and internationalism – Independent values – are under threat. Yet we, The Independent, continue to grow. Sponsored The Independent Visit The Independent Five killed and 80 missing after fire engulfs Philippines ferry Pilot of Amazon jet that overshot runway warned about speed: officials Trump promises to pay Americans $5,000 if Republicans win midterms Sponsored

.. copy and pasted from "Daily Mail" .. article written by Melissa Koening .. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: .. ".. She was overmedicated.. Lindsay Clancy was overmedicated?.. oh.. oh no.. That's so severely serious.. beyond comprehension that's so severely serious.. hanno.. you study being overmedicated.. and the heroic Doctor McPherson of Belleville, Ontario trying to cure you of your mental illness.. hanno.. and your beautiful nurse Karen.. hanno.. God bless the jurors.. God bless Reddington.. sob sob sob.. God bless her three deceased children.. Her poor little baby.. God bless her poor little sob sob sob deceased baby.. sob sob sob sob sob sob sob sob sob.. ".. Robert deniro is Non for Spielberg's Superman The Last of Krypton and for Spielberg's Superman Man of Steel.. ..

Daily Mail 2.4M Followers Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal what convinced them she was not guilty Story by Melissa Koenig • 9h • 3 min read Three women who served as jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial have opened up about their decision to find the mother-of-three not guilty of murder before one holdout juror forced a mistrial. Clancy, 36, had admitted strangling her children with exercise bands, but argued in court that she was overmedicated while suffering from postpartum depression and the cocktail of drugs she was prescribed brought on a psychosis. 'We weren't trying to figure out if she murdered the children, she did and she's admitting to that. We're trying to figure out: Did she know right from wrong at that time?' jury foreperson Roni Carlson recounted to NBC Boston. 'And with everybody saying she loved her children so much and everything proved she loved her children, from her journals to her mother-in-law, everything proved that she loved her children,' Carlson continued. 'So she had to have snapped.' Roni and two other female jurors opened up about their frustrations with one juror who refused to acquit. Roni and two other female jurors opened up about their frustrations with one juror who refused to acquit. Lone holdout triggered Clancy mistrial Based on that evidence, 11 of the 12 jurors were ready to find Clancy not guilty of murder by reason of insanity. But a lone holdout on the jury refused to acquit the former labor and delivery nurse, prompting Judge William Sullivan to declare a mistrial in the case. The three female jurors who spoke to NBC Boston now claim the unidentified juror 'would not interact with us and try to understand.' Related video: The lies that became a lasting part of Casey Anthony’s case (TRUE CRIME RECAPS) View on Watch View on Watch TRUE CRIME RECAPS The lies that became a lasting part of Casey Anthony’s case police. And since she'd already been in prison since 2008, Current Time 0:17 / Duration 7:45 0 'He had reasonable doubt. He admitted he had reasonable doubt,' Carlson said. 'I started filling out the forms, I was so excited. There were three forms I had to fill out, and then he said "but I'm still not going to say she's not guilty."' The jury of nine women and three men ultimately spent more than 37 hours deliberating five-and-a-half weeks worth of evidence, as they deliberated whether Clancy was guilty of the murders or manslaughter of Cora, five, Dawson, three and eight-month-old Callan in January 2023. Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal what convinced them she was not guilty Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal what convinced them she was not guilty Defense bid for further talks fails As the one juror then refused to side with the others late Thursday and early Friday, defense attorney Kevin Reddington sought an emergency order to try and force jurors to enter one final round of deliberations. But the motion failed, and Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial at Plymouth Superior Court on Friday afternoon. As a result, Clancy could face a retrial in the case. In a desperate attempt to prevent that from happening, Reddington on Tuesday pleaded with President Donald Trump to consider pardoning Clancy, describing her as a good person. 'Mr President, I hope that you would consider this young lady, the type of person she is, what she's been through, and consider a pardon,' the lawyer said on Good Morning America. He went on to describe Clancy as being 'intelligent' and 'hardworking,' while describing the strong bond he has with Clancy. 'I do feel a very strong bond with Lindsay because of the type of person she is. She's such a wonderful, wonderful person,' the lawyer said as he acknowledged he didn't know much about postpartum depression before taking on Clancy's trial. Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal what convinced them she was not guilty Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal what convinced them she was not guilty Reddington stands by ‘crushed’ prosecution remark Presenter George Stephanopoulos questioned the lawyer about his remarks at the end of the trial in which Reddington said he 'crushed' the prosecution, asking if he regretted them. 'I don't regret saying it at all,' Reddington responded. 'I think that the defense was very strong and I think it went in very well. FROM CALENDAR TO WORKFORCE INSIGHTS StaffStat’s SmartCalendar™ replaces paper and spreadsheets... FROM CALENDAR TO WORKFORCE INSIGHTS StaffStat’s SmartCalendar™ replaces paper and spreadsheets... StaffStat, Inc. StaffStat, Inc. · Sponsored call to action icon 'I think I perhaps could have been a little more circumspect dealing with [prosecutor] Tim Cruz, and instead of saying I crushed him, I could I have said I did a good job.' Reddington then said that he was open to reaching a deal with Cruz, the District Attorney, so that Clancy did not need to go through another trial. 'I'm willing to listen to Tim [Cruz]. I've known Tim for 30 years. I hope, however, after this trial, that he would revisit that issue and we could work something out that will be acceptable for both sides,' he added. Share your thoughts with us in the comments Read more Sponsored Daily Mail Visit Daily Mail Odegaard shows he is on a mission to put himself at top table of midfielders: Napoli 0-1 Arsenal Fears for UK national security as tech bosses bow to president and lock Britain out of latest model Cole Palmer leaves cavalry charge on night of Carabao Cup mayhem: Chelsea 6-3 Leeds Sponsored

.. copy and pasted from "The Canadian Press" .. .. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. oh.. oh.. oh.. oh.. sob sob sob sob.. poor, poor, poor Yvonne Woods.. She.. She.. that poor, poor woman.."..

The Canadian Press 527.7K Followers Former Colorado crime analyst gets 10-year prison sentence for manipulating DNA data 1h • 2 min read Former Colorado Bureau of Investigation forensic analyst Yvonne "Missy" Woods cries as she watches a video during a her sentencing hearing at the Jefferson County Courthouse, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, in Golden, Colo. (Stephen Swofford//The Gazette via AP, Pool Former Colorado Bureau of Investigation forensic analyst Yvonne "Missy" Woods cries as she watches a video during a her sentencing hearing at the Jefferson County Courthouse, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, in Golden, Colo. (Stephen Swofford//The Gazette via AP, Pool © The Associated Press GOLDEN, Colo. (AP) — A judge sentenced a former forensic analyst for the Colorado Bureau of Investigation to 10 years in prison on Tuesday after authorities said her manipulation of DNA data raised questions about the validity of hundreds of criminal cases. Yvonne “Missy” Woods pleaded guilty in June to perjury, attempting to influence a public servant, forgery and committing a cybercrime. Dozens of other counts were dismissed as part of a plea agreement. Your Peace of Mind Awaits Your Peace of Mind Awaits AllCleared AllCleared · Sponsored call to action icon Problems with the scientist’s work were found in cases involving homicide, sexual assault, robbery and other crimes, according to authorities. Prosecutors were forced to review hundreds of cases, and at least one murder conviction was vacated as a result of Woods’ misconduct. Former Colorado Bureau of Investigation forensic analyst Yvonne "Missy" Woods, center, , cries as she gives a personal statement as her lawyers Lindsay Brown, left, and Tom Ward, look on during a her sentencing hearing at the Jefferson County Courthouse, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, in Golden, Colo. (Stephen Swofford//The Gazette via AP, Pool Former Colorado Bureau of Investigation forensic analyst Yvonne "Missy" Woods, center, , cries as she gives a personal statement as her lawyers Lindsay Brown, left, and Tom Ward, look on during a her sentencing hearing at the Jefferson County Courthouse, Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, in Golden, Colo. (Stephen Swofford//The Gazette via AP, Pool © The Associated Press Woods had faced between 8 and 16 years in prison during Tuesday's sentencing hearing before state District Judge Andrew Poland in Golden, Colorado. She resigned in 2023 after a decades-long career. Authorities accused her of altering data to conceal tampering, deleting data that showed she failed to troubleshoot issues within the testing process and not thoroughly documenting tests performed in case records. Stunning Results From This Hairdressers Hair Regrowth Spray Stunning Results From This Hairdressers Hair Regrowth Spray Vital Life Style · Sponsored call to action icon Woods apologized during Tuesday's hearing but said she knew saying sorry would not undo the harm she caused, the Denver Post reported. “For many years I was entrusted with evidence that could have profound consequences for defendants, victims, families and the courts. I failed that responsibility. I am deeply sorry for that failure," she said. Following the sentencing, Colorado Bureau of Investigation officials said they have sought to reform their laboratories in response to the data scandal as they try to rebuild public trust. “The actions of one individual never define this organization, and they do not define the dedicated public servants who continued showing up every day with integrity," bureau Director Armando Saldate said in a statement. The investigation into Woods' misconduct began in September 2023 after an intern at the bureau discovered missing information in a case that Woods handled in 2018. According to an arrest affidavit, Woods allegedly told investigators at one point that she had changed data to complete cases more quickly. 100% iGaming Ontario Licensed. 99% of Withdrawals in Minutes. 3000+ Fun Games. Sign Up! 100% iGaming Ontario Licensed. 99% of Withdrawals in Minutes. 3000+ Fun Games. Sign Up! Betty Gaming Betty Gaming · Sponsored call to action icon In the vacated murder case, Michael Clark was released from prison in 2025 after his lawyers argued that DNA evidence was mishandled by Woods. Prosecutors said they would seek to retry him. In two homicide cases, the defendants received lesser sentences under plea deals than they could have faced if they went to trial because prosecutors were afraid Woods’ involvement could lead to acquittals. Convictions in other cases also have been challenged in courts across Colorado. A Colorado Bureau of Investigation internal affairs report in 2024 revealed that concerns about Woods’ work first surfaced more than a decade ago. As early as 2014, a worker questioned her testing of evidence, and in 2018 she was temporarily removed from working on DNA cases after being accused of data manipulation, the report said. State officials have said that the response to Woods’ actions could end up costing more than $11 million. The Associated Press Sponsored TOP STORIES FILE - A customer shops for produce at a FreshCo grocery store in Brampton, Ont., Friday, June 5, 2026. Canada's new counter-tariffs on the U.S. have officially gone into effect. Global NewsGlobal News Here’s where Canada’s counter-tariffs will hit Canadian wallets the hardest Trump’s Bombardier threat is an 'own goal' for Canada-U.S. defence ties, analysts say National PostNational Post Trump’s Bombardier threat is an 'own goal' for Canada-US defence ties, analysts say An Israeli settler works at a winery at the settlement of Yitzhar in the occupied West Bank, south of the Palestinian city of Nablus, on Tuesday. The U.K. government says it will implement a comprehensive trade ban and targeted sanctions on goods and services from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. CBCCBC Canada, UK., France to ban trade of goods from Israeli settlements in occupied West Bank Sponsored

.. Morveth Lord of Darkness .. is the official, quintessential music of.. this planet apocalips scale theme.. Daniel Day Lewis is Loki Skywalker in scorcese's future uncanny.. and Winona Ryder is The White Queen... a treu Brian Michael Bendis White Queen... and Daniel Day Lewis's Loki Skywalker loves Lorna Dane, played by Embeth Davidtz of "Don't lets go to the dogs tonight", so deeply.. He loves her so very deeply.. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult hyacinth "Fyenshya El" ryder antje "Faora ul" traue.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpW3eAEa5E0&list=RDRpW3eAEa5E0&start_radio=1

.. The Darkest Night .. by Arman Sayat .. is the official, quintessential music of.. Steve Rogers, played by Mikey Jerome: ..".. It's Sinthea Shmidt.. I'm in awe of her.. like.. I really do worship her.. I do.. because.. she has such an apocalyptic sense and pure intuition of the difference between right and wrong.. and.. heh.. I'm all grey area.. by contrast.. but she's grey area too.. and she knows the difference between right and wrong.. apocalyptically so..".. 'Art of Davidtz' gingerbread man Embeth Davidtz is Sinthea Shmidt who is at some point reborn as.. Sin.. Sin.. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult hyacinth "Fyenshya El" ryder antje "Faora ul" traue.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA3LWNvFJKE&list=RDpA3LWNvFJKE&start_radio=1 .. .. in the inwards of the previous URL .. watch?vivien .. pons Addition Three Luthors Westlake Night volk Fibonacci Jesse Kafka Energy .. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult hyacinth "Fyenshya El" ryder antje "Faora ul" traue.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

.. Hanno Alexander Ridal Raudsepp: ..".. Marty Scorcese.. Can actor screenwriter Matthew Raudsepp play Patrick Clancy, the understanding, compassionate former husband of Demi Moore's Lindsay Clancy.. in the 'Daredevil: the man without fear' films.. ?" .. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult hyacinth "sonia svetlana for sam raimi" ryder hyacinth 'is sonia svetlana actually a black widow named 'melina' " ryder winona horowitz emmanuelle hyacinth "The Baroness of Cobra" ryder monica "Vanessa Fisk the wife of the Kingpin" bellucci.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars.. .. ..

.. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. Monica Bellucci.. Vanessa Fisk, the loving wife of her husband, Wilson.. Monica Bellucci.. is this what Michelangelo Antonioni's 'La Notte' is like.. or Antonioni's film, 'Blow Up'.. because.. Albert Pyun directs the Matt Salinger Captain America movie with late Henry James level nuance and grace and subtlety.. and Stephen Tolkin's screenplay is an abyss of heartache.. I think that Juhan Shmidt or Johann Shmidt doesn't become the Red Skull until maybe nineteen seventy one or nineteen seveny two.. the years of Nixon and Kissinger and Bob Haldeman.. because.. because.. this is a movie about Italy.. Monica Bellucci.. I'm wondering.. Are you reading the work of Michael Ledeen on the philosophy of 'Creative Destruction'?" .. .. .. .. .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXV7-Cn9wO0&t=22s .. .. in the inwards of this URL .. watch?vivien .. yoriba eXcellent Visa Seven .. Canadian night Nine westlake Oval Zero and tigger .. twenty two seconds .. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult three year old wanda maximoff three year old kate moss three year old firestar or five year old firestar three or five year old megan d. iseult nine year old Angelica Jones nine year old megan d. iseult hyacinth "sonia svetlana" ryder hyacinth "a black widow named 'melina' " ryder winona horowitz emmanuelle hyacinth "The Baroness of COBRA" ryder monica "Nude Desdemona Anna aka The Fourth Baroness of Les Noeuf Soeurs of COBRA" bellucci monica "Vanessa Fisk" bellucci.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars

.. Stellarum .. Judgement of the Stars .. is the official, quintessential music of.. this planet apocalips Sean Bean Darkseid scale reality .. Holly Madison's Raven Darkholme aka Mystique and Vanessa Redgrave's Irene Adler aka Destiny are actually.. one and the same woman.. one and the same person.. and that person is.. Doctor Lauretta Bender.. also.. I wonder if there is something with James Joyce's finnegans wake or also his Ulysses and also with reading the Prose Edda both in english translation and in the original Icelandic text.. that is connected somehow.. somehow.. somehow.. to Doctor Lauretta Bender's study of language disorders.. this is what is in scorcese's future medusa uncanny.. three dollars.. stochastic disturbance terms.. issue eight twenty three paul dini / joe benitez poison ivy pamela isley kate moss megan d. iseult holly "raven darkholme aka mystique" madison bridget "Nude Dazzler" marquardt.. stochastic disturbance terms.. three dollars..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5fDmjEsk7w&list=RDK5fDmjEsk7w&start_radio=1

.. article copy and pasted from the website called 'truthout' .. article written by HP Albarelli and Jeffrey S. Kaye ..

Bobby is seven years old, but this is not the first time he has been subjected to electroshock. It’s his third time. In all, over the next year, Bobby will experience eight electroshock sessions. Placed on the examining table, he is held down by two male attendants while the physician places a solution on his temples. Bobby struggles with the two men holding him down, but his efforts are useless. He cries out and tries to pull away. One of the attendants tries to force a thick wedge of rubber into his mouth. He turns his head sharply away and cries out, “Let me go, please. I don’t want to be here. Please, let me go.” Bobby’s physician looks irritated and she tells him, “Come on now, Bobby, try to act like a big boy and be still and relax.” Bobby turns his head away from the woman and opens his mouth for the wedge that will prevent him from biting through his tongue. He begins to cry silently, his small shoulders shaking and he stiffens his body against what he knows is coming. Mary is only five years old. She sits on a small, straight-backed chair, moving her legs back and forth, humming the same four notes over and over and over. Her head, framed in a tangled mass of golden curls, moves up and down with each note. For the first three years of her life, Mary was thought to be a mostly normal child. Then, after she began behaving oddly, she had been handed off to a foster family. Her father and mother didn’t want her any longer. She had become too strange for her father, whose alcoholism clouded any awareness of his young daughter. Mary’s mother had never wanted her anyway and was happy to have her placed in another home. When the LSD Mary has been given begins to have its effects, she stops moving her head and legs and sits staring at the wall. She doesn’t move at all. After about ten minutes, she looks at the nearby physician observing her, and says, “God isn’t coming back today. He’s too busy. He won’t be back here for weeks.” From early 1940 to 1953, Dr. Lauretta Bender, a highly respected child neuropsychiatrist practicing at Bellevue Hospital in New York City, experimented extensively with electroshock therapy on children who had been diagnosed with “autistic schizophrenia.” In all, it has been reported that Bender administered electroconvulsive therapy to at least 100 children ranging in age from three years old to 12 years, with some reports indicating the total may be twice that number. One source reports that, inclusive of Bender’s work, electroconvulsive treatment was used on more than 500 children at Bellevue Hospital from 1942 to 1956, and then at Creedmoor State Hospital Children’s Service from 1956 to 1969. Bender was a confident and dogmatic woman, who bristled at criticism, oftentimes refused to acknowledge reality even when it stood starkly before her. Despite publicly claiming good results with electroshock treatment, privately Bender said she was seriously disappointed in the aftereffects and results shown by the subject children. Indeed, the condition of some of the children appeared to have only worsened. One six-year-old boy, after being shocked several times, went from being a shy, withdrawn child to acting increasingly aggressive and violent. Another child, a seven-year-old girl, following five electroshock sessions had become nearly catatonic. Years later, another of Bender’s young patients who became overly aggressive after about 20 treatments, now grown, was convicted in court as a “multiple murderer.” Others, in adulthood, reportedly were in and of trouble and prison for a battery of petty and violent crimes. A 1954 scientific study of about 50 of Bender’s young electroshock patients, conducted by two psychologists, found that nearly all were worse off after the “therapy” and that some had become suicidal after treatment. One of the children studied in 1954 was the son of well-known writer Jacqueline Susann, author of the bestselling novel “Valley of the Dolls.” Susann’s son, Guy, was diagnosed with autism shortly after birth and, when he was three years old, Dr. Bender convinced Susann and her husband that Guy could be successfully treated with electroshock therapy. Guy returned home from Bender’s care a nearly lifeless child. Susann later told people that Bender had “destroyed” her son. Guy has been confined to institutions since his treatment. To their credit, some of Dr. Bender’s colleagues considered her use of electroshock on children “scandalous,” but few colleagues spoke out against her, a situation still today common among those in the medical profession. Said Dr. Leon Eisenberg, a widely respected physician and true pioneer in the study of autistic children, “[Lauretta Bender] claimed that some of these children recovered [because of her use of shock treatment]. I once wrote a paper in which I referred to several studies by [Dr. E. R.] Clardy. He was at Rockwin State Hospital – the back up to Bellevue – and he described the arrival of these children. He considered them psychotic and perhaps worse off then before the treatment.” (This writer could find no case where any of Bender’s colleagues spoke out against her decidedly racist viewpoints. Bender made it quite clear that she felt that African-Americans were best characterized by their “capacity for laziness” and “ability to dance,” both features, Bender claimed, of the “specific brain impulses” of African-Americans.) About the same time Dr. Bender was conducting her electroshock experiments, she was also widely experimenting on autistic and schizophrenic children with what she termed other “treatment endeavors.” These included use of a wide array of psycho-pharmaceutical agents, several provided to her by the Sandoz Chemical Co. in Basel, Switzerland, as well as Metrazol, sub-shock insulin therapy, amphetamines and anticonvulsants. Metrazol was a trade name for pentylenetetrazol, a drug used as a circulatory and respiratory stimulant. High doses cause convulsions, as discovered in 1934 by the Hungarian-American neurologist and psychiatrist Ladislas J. Meduna. Metrazol had been used in convulsive therapy, but was never considered to be effective, and side effects such as seizures were difficult to avoid. The medical records of several patients who were confined at Vermont State Hospital, a public mental facility, reveal that Metrazol was administered to them by CIA contractor Dr. Robert Hyde on numerous occasions in order “to address overly aggressive behavior.” One of these patients, Karen Wetmore, received the drug on a number of occasions for no discernible medical reason. During the same ten-year period in which Metrazol was used by the Vermont State Hospital, patient deaths skyrocketed. In 1982, the FDA revoked its approval of Metrazol. Here it should be noted that, during the cold war years, CIA and Army Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC) interrogators, working as part of projects Bluebird and Artichoke, sometimes injected large amounts of Metrazol into selected enemy or Communist agents for the purposes of severely frightening other suspected agents, by forcing them to observe the procedure. The almost immediate effects of Metrazol are shocking for many to witness: subjects will shake violently, twisting and turning. They typically arch, jerk and contort their bodies and grimace in pain. With Metrazol, as with electroshock, bone fractures – including broken necks and backs – and joint dislocations are not uncommon, unless strong sedatives are administered beforehand. A November 1936 Time magazine article seriously questioned the benefits of Metrazol, citing “irreversible shock” as a “great danger.” The article described a typical Metrazol injection as such: “A patient receives no food for four or five hours. Then about five cubic centimeters of the drug [Metrazol] are injected into his veins. In about half-a-minute he coughs, casts terrified glances around the room, twitches violently, utters a horse wail, freezes into rigidity with his mouth wide open, arms and legs stiff as boards. Then he goes into convulsions. In one or two minutes the convulsions are over and he gradually passes into a coma, which lasts about an hour. After a series of shocks, his mind may be swept clean of delusions…. A patient is seldom given more than 20 injections and if no improvement is noted after ten treatments, he is usually given up as hopeless.” The Army, the CIA and Metrazol Army CIC interrogators working with the CIA at prisoner of war camps and safe house locations in post-war Germany on occasion used Metrazol, morphine, heroin and LSD on incarcerated subjects. According to former CIC officer Miles Hunt, several “safe houses and holding areas outside of Frankfurt near Oberursel” – a former Nazi interrogation center taken over by the US – were operated by a “special unit run by Capt. Malcolm S. Hilty, Maj. Mose Hart and Capt. Herbert Sensenig. The unit was especially notorious in its applications of interrogation methods [including the use of electroshock and Metrazol, mescaline, amphetamines and other drugs].” Said Hunt: “The unit took great pride in their nicknames, the ‘Rough Boys’ and the ‘Kraut Gauntlet,’ and didn’t hold back with any drug or technique … you name it, they used it.” Added Hunt, “Sensenig was really disappointed when it was found that nothing had to be used on [former Reichsmarschall] Herman Goering, who was processed through the camp. Goering needed no inducement to talk.” Eventually, CIC interrogators working in Germany would be assisted in their use of interrogation drugs by several “former” Nazi scientists recruited by the CIA and US State Department as part of Project Paperclip. By early 1952, the CIC’s Rough Boys would routinely use Metrazol during interrogations, as well as LSD, mescaline and conventional electroshock units. Metrazol-like drugs are still used in interrogations today. According to reports from several former noncommissioned Army officers, who served on rendition-related security details in Turkey, Pakistan and Romania, drugs that produce effects quite similar to Metrazol are still used in 2010 by the Pentagon and CIA on enemy combatants and rendered subjects held at the many “black sites” maintained across the globe. Observed one former officer recently, “They would twist up like a pretzel, in unbelievable shapes and jerk and shake like crazy, their eyes nearly popping out of their heads.” In 2008, at the behest of US Sens. Carl Levin, Joe Biden and Chuck Hagel and in reaction to a March 2008 article in The Washington Post, the Pentagon initiated an Inspector General Report on the use of “mind-altering substances by DoD [Department of Defense] Personnel during Interrogations of Detainees and/or Prisoners Captured during the War on Terror.” It is not known if the investigation has been completed. Among the more famous recent cases of the use of drugs upon prisoners concerns one-time alleged “enemy combatant” Jose Padilla, who had originally been accused of wanting to set off a “dirty bomb.” The charge was later forced, but Padilla was held in solitary confinement for many months and forced to take LSD or other powerful drugs while held in the Navy brig in Charleston, South Carolina. The government has gone to great efforts to keep the public uninformed as regards use of drugs on prisoners. In an article by Carol Rosenberg for McClatchy News in July 2010, Rosenberg reported that, when covering the Guantanamo military commissions trials, when the question of “what psychotropic drugs were given another accused 9/11 conspirator, Ramzi bin al Shibh, the courtroom censor hits a white noise button so reporters viewing from a glass booth can’t hear the names of the drugs. Under current Navy instructions for the use of human subjects in research, the undersecretary of the Navy is described as the authority in charge of research concerning “consciousness-altering drugs or mind-control techniques,” while at the same time is also responsible for “inherently controversial topics” that might attract media interest or “challenge by interest groups.” Dr. Bender Discovers LSD In 1955 and1956, Dr. Bender began hearing glowing accounts about the potential of LSD for producing remarkable results in children suffering mental disorders, including autism and schizophrenia. Bender’s earlier work with electroshock therapy had brought her into contact with several other prominent physicians who, at the time, were covert contractors with the CIA’s MK/ULTRA and Artichoke projects. Primary among these physicians were Drs. Harold A. Abramson, Paul Hoch, James B. Cattell, Joel Elkes, Max Fink, Harris Isbell and Alfred Hubbard. Some of these names may be familiar to readers. Dr. Abramson, a noted allergist who surreptitiously worked for both the US Army and CIA since the late 1940s, was the physician Frank Olson was taken to see, shortly before his murder in New York City in November 1953. About a year earlier, Drs. Hoch and Cattell were responsible for injecting unwitting New York State Psychiatric Institute patient Harold Blauer with a massive dose of mescaline that killed him. Dr. Elkes was one of the earliest physicians in Europe to experiment with LSD, having requested samples of the drug from Sandoz Chemical Co. in 1949. Elkes was a close associate of Dr. Abraham Wikler, who worked closely with Dr. Harris Isbell at the now-closed Lexington, Kentucky, prison farm, where hundreds of already drug-addicted inmates were given heroin in exchange for their participation in LSD and mescaline experiments underwritten by the CIA and Pentagon. Elkes worked closely with the CIA, Pentagon and Britain’s MI6 on drug experiments in England and the United States. Dr. Fink, who was greatly admired by Bender, is considered the godfather of electroshock therapy in the United States. In the early 1950s and beyond, Fink was a fully cleared CIA Project Artichoke consultant. In 1951, CIA officials under the direction of Paul Gaynor and Morse Allen of the agency’s Security Research Service (SRS) that oversaw Artichoke, worked closely with Fink in New York City in efforts to thoroughly explore the merits of electroshock techniques for interrogations. The CIA was especially interested in the use of standard electroshock machines in producing amnesia, inducing subjects to talk and making subjects more prone to hypnotic control. According to one CIA document, Fink told officials “an individual could gradually be reduced through the use to electroshock treatment to the vegetable level.” In addition to Fink, Bender also greatly admired the work of Dr. Lothar B. Kalinowsky, a psychiatrist who also consulted closely with the CIA on electroshock matters. Kalinowsky, who was part Jewish and had fled Germany in 1933, was Fink’s close friend and, like Fink, was widely recognized as an expert on electroconvulsive therapy. Kalinowsky met with the CIA’s Allen and Gaynor frequently and sometimes was accompanied by Dr. Fink at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, where he worked closely with Dr. Hoch. While it is clear from Dr. Bender’s papers that she also considered the early LSD work of “Dr.” Alfred M. Hubbard in Vancouver, Canada, to be “very substantial and beneficial,” it is important to state here that Hubbard was not a physician nor did he have any formal medical training. Hubbard, a jovial character who sometimes worked with the FBI and CIA, was a strong proponent of the use of LSD. Despite the fact that he had no medical credentials and once served time in prison for smuggling, he hoodwinked the Sandoz Chemical Co. into supplying him such ample amounts of LSD that he dispersed so widely and abundantly that he earned the title “The Johnny Appleseed of LSD.” Hubbard’s use of LSD in allegedly curing alcoholism is still cited today. How Hubbard so easily passed as a physician is unknown. Even a 1961 paper published by New York Medical College, Department of Psychiatry, and authored by Dr. A.M. Freedman, cited Hubbard’s LSD work with “children, primarily delinquents” to have been 85% successful.” Other physicians whom Dr. Bender consulted about the effects of LSD on children were Drs. Ronald A. Sandison, Thomas M. Ling and John Buckman. These three worked in England at both the Chelsea Clinic in London and Potwick Hospital in Worcestershire, outside of London. Sandison is credited with having been the first person to bring LSD into England, this in 1952 after he met Albert Hofmann in Basle, Switzerland, at the Sandoz Chemical laboratories. Hofmann handed Sandison a box of around 600 ampules, each containing 100 micrograms of LSD. Back in England, Sandison shared his psychedelic bounty with associates Drs. Ling and Buckman. Before the year was out, Sandison also turned Hubbard on to LSD, guiding Hubbard through his first trip. Sandison also began a new treatment program at the Gothic-looking Potwick facility that he dubbed Psycholytic Therapy. His program’s patients were mostly schizophrenics. In 1958, an LSD treatment unit was established at Potwick. Over the years, it has been reported that the CIA, MI6 and the Macy Foundation secretly helped finance the unit. Dr. Elkes helped by raising about $75,000 for the unit’s operation. For the next ten years the unit administered over 15,000 doses of LSD to about 900 patients. Drs. Buckman and Ling worked closely with Sandison in the Potwick unit. In 1963, Buckman and Ling wrote in a publication, describing “good examples” of the use of LSD in psycholytic psychotherapy: “The patients’ experiences under LSD have not supported Marx’s dictum that Religion is the opium of the people but rather that there is a deep basic belief in a Supreme Being, whether the religion background be Christian, Jewish or Hindu.” Dr. Buckman also worked at London’s Chelsea Clinic, often times treating adults and sometimes children. Buckman believed strongly that “frigidity” in women could be treated successfully with LSD. In 1967, he said of LSD: “Many therapists believe that a transcendental experience – a feeling that it is a good world and one is a part of it – is a curative experience in itself.” According to several informed sources in the London, for years MI6, the British intelligence service and the CIA closely monitored the LSD work conducted by Sandison, Ling and Buckman. Two Sisters, LSD and Dr. Buckman Marion McGill, today an attorney and college professor in the western United States and her sister, Trudy, were sent in 1960 by their parents to be interviewed by Drs. Ling and Buckman at the Chelsea Clinic in London. At the time, Marion was 13 years old and her sister was 15. Marion says that both her mother and father were “quite taken with the benefits of LSD and thought that we would also benefit from the drug.” Both parents had undergone a series of ten LSD “treatments” at the Chelsea clinic. Marion goes on: “As a 13-year old at the time, my decision-making capacity was very limited. I was, by nature, fairly compliant and docile, rather eager to please my parents. I understood nothing of what was being suggested for me and my 15 year-old sister – namely that we participate in some sort of ‘research’ that both our parents had also participated in. Whether the word ‘experiment’ was used, I don’t recall. The term ‘LSD’ was vaguely familiar, however, because my parents were ‘taking’ this drug as a form of ‘quick therapy’ – their term for it – that had been recommended by my uncle, a psychiatrist at a well known east coast medical school. Both parents needed therapy, in my view. While highly successful professionally, my father was a tightly wound, rather angry and insecure man, an accomplished academic, but an ‘industrial strength narcissist,’ as I later called him. My mother was a submissive, obedient, Catholic woman without much identity of her own, other than being a doctor’s wife. “My sister and I, however, were about as ‘normal’ as any two teenagers could be. We were at the top of our classes in school; both of us had lots of friends, participated in extra curricular activities. We didn’t need ‘therapy.’ We were told we would get a day off from school after each overnight stay at the clinic for this LSD. It was perhaps the prospect of a day off from Catholic girls’ school that persuaded us to do it. I wasn’t aware of making a ‘decision.’ The purpose of this program was never explained. There were to be 10 sessions – once a week for 10 weeks. I believe they started in January 1960. “The experiences at the clinic where the LSD was administered were quite strange. There was a brief ‘interview’ by Dr. John Buckman, asking banal questions about health issues (none), but providing no information about what to expect from the LSD. There was no mention, for example, of hallucinations or perceptual distortions or anything frightening. I was not informed of any persistent effects, such as nightmares. Certainly the possibility of lasting damage was not mentioned. The word ‘experiment’ was not used. There was, in other words, no informed consent whatsoever. I was not told that I could refuse to participate, that I could quit at any time (as provided in the Nuremberg Code). Since I was below the age of consent, my parents would have been the ones to agree to this. Indeed, they were the ones to suggest that we be used in these experiments. It would not otherwise have happened. But my parents would never discuss this in later years and never explained why they did it. “During the 10 sessions, each of which involved an injection, my sister and I were kept in separate bedrooms, darkened rooms, usually with someone present in the room, but I don’t know who the person was. Occasionally, my mother was also present. At times, I was so frightened by the hallucinations that I screamed and tried to escape from the room. I remember once actually reaching the hallway and being forcibly put back into the bedroom by my mother. I saw a wild array of images – nightmarish visions, occasionally provoking hysterical laughter, followed immediately by wracking sobs. I had no idea what was happening to me. It was terrifying. “There was no effort to counsel us during or after each of these sessions. There was no ‘debriefing,’ no explanation of what was happening or why this was being done to us. Why I did not refuse to participate after I first experienced it, I don’t know. But as an adult and later as a professional medical ethicist, I recognized this lack of resistance as a function of childhood itself. Most children who are victims of parental abuse do not know how to resist. They fear rejection by parents more than they fear the abuse, it seems. The ‘power differential’ is huge between parents and children and the dependence on parents is virtually absolute. We were also, living in London at the time, away from our friends. My sister and I had been told not to talk about what we were doing. We were Catholics, obedient to parents, etc. Our father was a doctor, after all – it was hard to grasp that he would do harm to us or that our mother would. Children just don’t think this way initially. A child’s dependency usually means trusting one’s parents or caregivers. “Although each individual session was often terrifying, any lasting effects of the LSD unfolded gradually. In the weeks immediately following the final session, I experienced frequent nightmares – visions of crawling insects, horrible masks, etc. I couldn’t sleep. I was afraid to shut my eyes. I became afraid of the dark. My parents were dismissive and unsympathetic. Their attitude was, in some ways, more disturbing to me than the experiments themselves because it meant that my parents had known full well that the experience would very likely be frightening – and hadn’t cared. “I discovered that my parents were dishonest and unfeeling in ways that I could not comprehend. They told my sister and me never to talk about the LSD experiences, never to disclose what had happened in London. This further ruptured our relationship with them, a relationship that was, by then, permanently damaged. I was still dependent on them, however and so was my sister. “Two years after these experiments, during her freshman year in college, my sister suffered a nervous breakdown. I don’t know the extent to which the LSD may have precipitated this. But my parents’ response to what was probably a mild breakdown from which my sister could have recovered, was coercive and drastic. She had been asking questions about the LSD at this time. She was angry about it. We both were. We talked about it together, but I was afraid to confront our parents. My sister was not. The angrier she became, the more she was ‘diagnosed’ as a ‘psychiatric’ case and the more medication she was given. To this day, my sister is heavily medicated. She never fully recovered from that first episode. “Our parents responded to my sister’s anger in a way that frightened me further. I also felt tremendous guilt for not being able to prevent the horrors that my sister endured. Once she was ‘classified’ as a psychiatric patient, she was lost. Everything that was done to her in the name of ‘treatment’ seemed to me to be a form of ongoing abuse and torture. “The fact that our father was a prominent, internationally known and widely respected physician – and his brother, who had introduced us to this LSD horror, was a prominent, internationally known and widely respected psychiatrist – made it impossible to expose them or go against them. Their reputations were more important to them than the health and well being of my sister. “My own response was simply to leave home. I never trusted my parents again after the London LSD experience. I discovered many other ways in which my father and my uncle lied, covered up, dissembled and eventually threatened me, in order to keep this story from being told. “On a positive note, the experience informed my career choices in both human rights and medical ethics, but it also made me alert to the ways in which academic medicine was – and is – corrupted by the drug industry itself and by the continuing abuse of human subjects to further the development of drugs as weapons – both for interrogation potential and also, more subtle behavior control on a massive scale. My own experience also sensitized me to the special vulnerability of children and teenagers in the medical environment. “Even when I subsequently confronted my father with the evidence that LSD had been tested by the CIA for use as a military weapon in the 1950s and 1960s, he dismissed his participation by saying that it was an ‘enlightening experience, like visiting an art gallery.’ When I pointed out that this was not my experience as a child, he dismissed it, including the presumption that I must be a ‘conspiracy theorist’ to propose such a thing. At the age of 91, he finally admitted that it had perhaps not been a very good idea to subject my sister and me to LSD. “Dr. Buckman and Ling were knowing participants in ongoing intelligence-based work with mind altering drugs. I ‘met’ Buckman in London when I was 13, but encountered him again years later at the university medical school in the United States where he was on the faculty. “I went to see Dr. Buckman in his office. I asked him what he thought about the ethics of using children in an LSD experiment. At first, he didn’t seem to realize who I was. I identified myself as one of his ‘subjects’ and gave him my business card as a Medical Ethicist and lawyer. He was clearly shocked, stood up, refused to talk to me and told me to leave his office. Shortly thereafter, I received a phone call from my father. His brother, the psychiatrist and colleague of Dr. Buckman, had been alerted to my impromptu visit. Subsequently, both my uncle and my father threatened me, saying they would make sure I lost my university faculty position if I disclosed anything publicly about the LSD experiments in London. “‘You will never work in bioethics again,’ they said. “The response of all these men to the threat of disclosure indicates their lack of ethical scruples, their lack of empathy, their own pathology. I don’t know what the exact term would be, but I suspect there is a form of psychological ‘doubling’ at work – the sort of thing that was described in [Robert Jay] Lifton’s book, The Nazi Doctors who were able to ignore their Hippocratic oath to ‘first, do no harm,’ and to inflict unimaginable horrors on their fellow human beings. “The loss of my sister has been a life long source of sorrow for me. I attribute it to the LSD and its cover up, whether the chemicals themselves ’caused’ her disintegration or not. In law this is called a ‘contributing cause.’ I learned that people cover up the most awful things, not just within a family but within communities, within universities, within ‘polite society.’ There is probably no absolute barrier that will prevent these things from being done, but they have to be exposed and called out for what they are, whenever they occur.” Dr. Bender’s LSD Experiments on Children Shortly after deciding to initiate her own LSD experiments on children, Bender attended a conference sponsored by a CIA front group, the Josiah Macy Foundation. The conference focused on LSD research and featured Dr. Harold A. Abramson as a presenter. In 1960, Abramson conducted his own LSD experiments on a group of six children ranging in age from five to 14 years of age. A few short months after the Macy Foundation conference, Dr. Bender was notified that her planned LSD experiments would be partially and surreptitiously funded by the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology (SIHE), another CIA front group then located in Forest Hills, New York. The Society, headed by James L. Monroe, a former US Air Force officer who had worked on top-secret psychological warfare and propaganda projects, oversaw about 55 top-secret experiments underwritten by the CIA. These projects involved LSD, ESP, black magic, astrology, psychological warfare, media manipulation, and other subjects. Apparently, Bender’s work with children and LSD raised some concerns at the CIA’s Technical Services Division (TSD). A 1961 TSD memo written to Monroe questioned the “operational benefits of Dr. Bender’s work as related to children and LSD,” and requested to be kept “closely appraised of the possible links between Dr. Bender’s project and those being conducted under separate MK/ULTRA funding at designated prisons in New York and elsewhere.” In 1960, Dr. Bender launched her first experiments with LSD and children. They were conducted within the Children’s Unit, Creedmoor State Hospital in Queens, New York. The LSD she used was supplied by Dr. Rudolph P. Bircher of the Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company. (Dr. Bircher also provided Bender with UML-491, also a Sandoz-produced product, very much like LSD but sometimes “dreamier” in effect and longer lasting.) Her initial group of young subjects consisted of 14 children diagnosed schizophrenic, all under the age of 11. (Because diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, autism, and other disorders have changed over the decades, one cannot assess what actual conditions these children really had.) There were 11 boys and three girls, ranging in age from six to ten years old. Jean Marie is almost seven years old. She came here nearly a year ago after her parents abandoned her to the care of an aunt who had no interest in raising her. Marie, who prefers to be called Jean, is shy, withdrawn, and distrustful of most adults she encounters. There are reports she may have been sexually molested by her uncle … Despite her withdrawn nature she smiles easily, and enjoys the company of other children. After receiving LSD on three occasions earlier this month, Marie ceased smiling at all and lost any interest in others her age … In the past week, she seems to have become easily agitated and has lost any interest in reading, something she seemed to very much enjoy before treatment. In a published report on her 196 LSD experiments with 14 “autistic schizophrenic” children, Bender states she initially gave each of the children 25 mcg. of LSD “intramuscularly while under continuous observation.” She writes: “The two oldest boys, over ten years, near or in early puberty, reacted with disturbed anxious behavior. The oldest and most disturbed received Amytal sodium 150 mg. intramuscularly and returned to his usual behavior.” Both boys were then excluded from the experiment. The 12 remaining children were then given injections of 25 mcg. of LSD and then days later were each given 100 mcg. of LSD once a week. Bender’s report states: “Then it was increased gradually to twice and three times a week as no untoward side-effects were noticed…. Finally, it was given daily and this continued for six weeks until the time of this report.” Bender’s findings and conclusions concerning her LSD experiments indicated she found the use of the drug promising. Bender reported: “In general, they [the children] were happier; their mood was ‘high’ in the hours following the ingestion of the drug … they have become more spontaneously playful with balls and balloons … their color is rosy rather than blue or pale and they have gained weight.” Bender concluded: “The use of these drugs [LSD, UML-401, UML-491] … will give us more knowledge about both the basic schizophrenic process and the defensive autism in children and also about the reaction of these dilysergic acid derivatives as central and autonomic nervous system stimulants and serotonin antagonists. Hopefully these drugs will also contribute to our efforts to find better therapeutic agents for early childhood schizophrenia.” In an article published in 1970, Dr. Bender reported on the results of LSD dosing upon “two adolescent boys who were mildly schizophrenic.” She reported that the boys experienced perceptual distortions. They thought the researchers were making faces at them, that their pencils were becoming “rubbery,” and one boy reported the other boy’s face had turned green. The boys began to complain that they were being experimented upon. Even so, Bender and her associate continued the two male adolescents on a regimen of 150 mcg. per day, in divided doses, of LSD. While one of the boys supposedly “benefited very much,” Bender reported that he later returned to the hospital as “a disturbed adult schizophrenic.” The other boy kept complaining that he was being experimented upon and they stopped giving him LSD, not because of the drug’s effects itself, Bender explained, but “because of the boy’s attitude towards it,” which she attributed to “his own psychopathology.” Dr. Bender’s LSD experiments continued into the late 1960s and, during that time, continued to include multiple experiments on children with UML-401, a little known LSD-type drug provided to her by the Sandoz Company, as well as UML-491, also a Sandoz product. Bender’s reports on her LSD experiments give no indication of whether the parents or legal guardians of the subject children were aware of, or consented to, the experiments. Without doubt, parents or guardians were never informed that the CIA underwrote Bender’s work. Over the years, there have been multiple reports that many of Bender’s subject children were either “wards of the State” or orphans, but the available literature on the experiments reveals nothing on this. The same literature makes it obvious that the children had been confined to the Creedmoor State Hospital for long periods of time and that many, if discharged, needed “suitable homes or placements in the community.” There is also no evidence that any follow-up studies were conducted on any of the children experimented upon by Dr. Bender. Today, Dr. Bender is best known and highly regarded in some circles as the creator of the Bender-Gestalt Test, which measures motor skills in children. On Bender’s use of LSD on children, Dr. Leon Eisenberg said years later: “She did all sorts of things. Lauretta Bender reached success in her career long before randomized controlled trials had even been heard of. She didn’t see the need for trials of drugs because she was convinced she knew what worked.” (See: “A History of Autism: Conversations with the Pioneers” by Adam Feinstein, Wiley-Blanchard, 2010.) Many other physicians speaking privately were far less diplomatic in condemning Bender’s LSD work, but, still today, many are reluctant to criticize her, and, remarkably, many of the aging stalwarts of the arguable “virtues” and “potential” of LSD continue to cite her work with children as groundbreaking science. Today, nearly 60 years beyond the horrors of Dr. Bender’s CIA-sponsored experiments on children, few people are aware that they were conducted. For most people, regardless of their awareness of the experiments, it is difficult to fathom how intelligent, highly educated physicians and scientists could partake in such brutal, uncaring, unethical and illegal experiments on children. What was the basis of their motivation? Was it the quest for some sort of elusive medical grail? Was it for economic gain? Or was it simply the result of a misguided search for knowledge that appeared so infinitely important that any sense of compassion and respect for human rights and dignity was cast aside in the name of a higher goal or good – a search at times so exhilarating with the sense that one is at the precipice of a momentous discovery that any semblance of respect for humankind was thrown aside? One can easily come to any and all these conclusions simply by reading the professional papers of such scientists and researchers. Not once do any of these papers express concern for the subjects at hand or denote any pangs of conscience at violating any oaths, codes and statutes regarding patient rights, human rights or human dignity. That America’s most shameful period of human experimentation, the years 1950 through to about 1979, came on the heels of the making and adoption of the Nuremberg Codes only adds to the shame and hypocrisy. Today, human experimentation is still aggressively conducted by US government-sponsored and employed physicians and scientists regardless of those codes, which came directly out of the shocking madness of the Nazi era. That government-sponsored experimentation still occurs makes a mockery of any governmental efforts, however valid, to protect people from science run amok – and a nation that uses its young, its children, for such pursuits is a nation whose commitment to human rights and democratic principles should be seriously questioned and challenged. (The names Marion McGill and that of her sister Trudy, are pseudonyms. Marion is a highly respected attorney and college professor, who asked that her real name not be used in this article. All other names in this article are real.)

.. The quote below from the website called 'truthout' is to qualify.. wait.. I wonder if there is a better word than 'qualify'.. I mean.. I wrote dialogue for Holly Madison's Doctor Lauretta Bender when I read only the beginning of this article on the website called 'truthout'.. and then I was reading through the whole article.. and I'm really not SURE that.. I mean.. I think that it's only after the electroshock treatment had such horrific consequences for the little children who were her patients.. only after that that she resorted to pharmaceutical medication.. after all.. after all.. and the description of LSD bringing peace and maybe happiness.. maybe she thought that most of all what her patients needed was to feel EMOTIONS or HAPPY FEELINGS and happy sensations.. and she may have felt that LSD would do that.. I've always been deeply troubled by LSD without even researching it.. the following dialogue for Holly Madison's Doctor Lauretta Bender is.. I mean.. I read that Doctor Lauretta Bender used electroshock on autistic schizophrenic young children and there is something to the subtext of reading this that feels like.. that she chose electroshock treatment over psychotropic medication.. Later on, in the article in question on the website titled "truthout".. an article written by HP Albarelli and Jeffrey S. Kaye.. It says that actually Doctor Lauretta Bender did use pharmaceutical medications on her patients.. also the article said she also tried to use.. It connects her with the use of LSD in her treatment of patients.. The article talks so much about little children being her patients.. and.. and.. maybe Holly Madison and Hugh Hefner can take it from here.. .. Really Slow Motion .. I am not human .. is the official, quintessential song of.. Doctor Lauretta Bender, played by Holly Madison: ..".. What I don't understand is.. the idea of.. you heal the mind by killing the patient.. I don't understand that at all.. I'm not using psychotropic medication on these tiny adorable children.. I'm using electroshock treatment.. electricity.. telluric currents are electricity and magnetism.. I'm still investigating telluric currents tentatively.. to see what can heal these adorable little children who have been so horrifically psychologically and emotionally victimized by autism and schizophrenia.. electricity.. electroshock treatment is what I am trying.. to use.. to heal the mind of these adorable little children.. instead of using.. drugs.. medication.. psychopathic psychotropic pills for that purpose.. thanks, ultron..". robert deniro is non. holly madison is doctor lauretta bender who may honestly turn out to be one and the same person as the holly madison mystique in scorcese's future medusa uncanny.willie tell archer the first as martinique jason.

About the same time Dr. Bender was conducting her electroshock experiments, she was also widely experimenting on autistic and schizophrenic children with what she termed other “treatment endeavors.” These included use of a wide array of psycho-pharmaceutical agents, several provided to her by the Sandoz Chemical Co. in Basel, Switzerland, as well as Metrazol, sub-shock insulin therapy, amphetamines and anticonvulsants. Metrazol was a trade name for pentylenetetrazol, a drug used as a circulatory and respiratory stimulant. High doses cause convulsions, as discovered in 1934 by the Hungarian-American neurologist and psychiatrist Ladislas J. Meduna.. .. .. .. .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BVWsRD3xIg&list=RDkBH-dO68ooA&index=3

.. article copy and pasted from the "Daily Mail" .. article written by Sarah Vine .. article dated to September the Seventh, two thousand twenty six.. nightingale mist the second of planet apocalips: ..".. sob sob sob sob.. God Bless Sarah Vine.. poor, poor, poor Lindsay Clancy.. and poor, poor Sarah Vine.. I.. I've never been pregnant.. I've never had children.. I have no understanding personally emotionally or psychologically of what postpartum psychosis is.. but.. It sounds so very very very terrifying..".robert deniro is non for spielberg's "The Last Son of Krypton".brandon cody routh is Clark Kent for Spielberg.michael brandon rosenbaum is Alexis Luthor for Spielberg's "The Last Son of Krypton".

Opinion: Lindsay Clancy is already serving a life sentence By SARAH VINE, COLUMNIST Published: 13:08 EDT, 7 September 2026 | Updated: 13:08 EDT, 7 September 2026 e-mail There are some things a healthy human mind simply cannot comprehend, and a mother who kills her children is one. That is why the trial of Lindsay Clancy, a former maternity nurse from Massachusetts, has captivated and divided opinion on both sides of the Atlantic. On a snowy night in 2023, Clancy strangled her three children with exercise bands before slitting her own wrists and attempting self-harm by throwing herself out of her bedroom window. She did not die with her children that night, as she presumably intended, but survived, paralysed and confined to a wheelchair. In some ways there can be no crueller punishment – to live on in a hopeless hell of her own making, every waking second haunted by the memory of that terrible night. But even though she is already serving a life sentence of misery, the question remained: Were her actions the result of postpartum psychosis (her youngest, Callan, was just eight months old), as her defence team argued, or did she, as the prosecution claimed, act ‘intentionally, rationally and swiftly to accomplish a very specific goal – to kill’? In court, she sobbed constantly, sometimes so loudly that the judge had to halt proceedings. Outside, women travelled from all over America to show support for her, wearing pink shirts in solidarity with someone they believed was a victim, of medical neglect, of how the system treats new mothers (postpartum psychosis is rare – two in 1,000 – but postnatal depression is far more common, affecting between 10 per cent and 15 per cent of women). Ultimately the jury – three men and nine women – were unable to reach a unanimous verdict, and the judge declared a mistrial. This means that Clancy could stand trial again – although lawyers for her ex-husband and the children’s father, Patrick Clancy, were keen to stress how traumatic the whole process had been for him and warned that the prospect ‘of reliving this tragedy through another trial is extraordinarily painful’. It’s hard to see what purpose another trial would serve. Her guilt is not in question – it’s her motives that remain unclear. But either way, she will be forever reviled as a child killer. Lindsay Clancy’s life is effectively over. +4 Lindsay Clancy with her then husband Patrick and their children, Cora, Dawson and Callan, whom she strangled with exercise bands. +4 Lindsay Clancy with her then husband Patrick and their children, Cora, Dawson and Callan, whom she strangled with exercise bands. TRENDING King: Harry and Meghan are still not working royals after return 23.7k viewing now Truth about the Falling Man: Sister tells heartbreaking full story 90.1k viewing now More Labour councils chaos as Rayner halts controversial shake-up 3.8k viewing now Clancy Case Shines Light on Postnatal Depression But for Mr Clancy, the children’s father, his is not. He has since moved to New York and re-married, to a doctor who specialises in infertility treatment. In all aspects of this tragedy, he has been incredibly magnanimous towards his ex. ‘I wasn’t married to a monster – I was married to someone who got sick,’ he told an interviewer in 2024. He should be allowed to move on as best he can in peace. This case has shone a light on the whole issue of postnatal depression, and of how it should be treated. Years ago, after I had my son, I was diagnosed with quite severe postnatal depression. Reading some of the extracts from Clancy’s journals, which were recovered from the family home in the aftermath of the killings, I shuddered, recognising many of her feelings. The entries chronicled desperation, insomnia, ‘crazy brain fog’ and guilt. ‘I’m so desperate to get a mental break that my mind is trying to make something physically wrong with me,’ she wrote in 2022. Sleep-training Callan ‘just about killed me’, she noted. ‘I feel like I can’t make a plan. I can’t carry it out. Like I just live moment to moment,’ and ‘I’m drowning every day’. I recognise those feelings all too well, even at a distance of over two decades. When my son was born, my daughter was just 16 months old: She struggled to adapt to the new arrival. He then became very ill, which led to all sorts of other difficulties. A combination of exhaustion, hormones, guilt and anxiety left me struggling both physically and mentally. I remember joking to a friend that I was desperate for something to happen to me so I could have a ‘non-fatal hospitalisation’ and get a few nights’ proper sleep. I also remember how at times I would be seized by an almost uncontrollable rage. There were moments when I genuinely scared myself. I remember once, for example, being unable to get the children’s double buggy to unfold in a supermarket car park. The children were crying in the back of the car, it was raining and I just suddenly reached the end of my tether. I smashed the buggy on to the Tarmac like a woman possessed. God knows what any passer-by must have thought. The tiniest thing would send me into a tailspin. I was a nightmare of neuroses. But I was lucky: At a check-up, my GP picked up on my low mood. He asked if I was OK, and my emotional dam just burst. Not long after, I found myself in the office of a psychiatrist, who diagnosed a textbook case of postnatal depression. He told me sometimes in cases like mine he might recommend a period of removal from the children (the thought of which was like a knife to my heart) but that he did not think I was a danger to them. More, he said, a danger to myself. In court, Lindsay sobbed constantly, sometimes so loudly that the judge had to halt proceedings. +4 In court, Lindsay sobbed constantly, sometimes so loudly that the judge had to halt proceedings. Her defence team argued that her actions were the result of postpartum psychosis (her youngest, Callan, was just eight months old). +4 Her defence team argued that her actions were the result of postpartum psychosis (her youngest, Callan, was just eight months old). Postpartum Depression Left Me Feeling Like a Failure With a combination of rest, medication and help from family and friends, I recovered. But I remember only too well how desolate I felt, how convinced I was that I was a total failure as a mother (and wife). Until then I had never had a day’s mental illness. Since then, the black dog has only ever been just around the corner. I was lucky: I had the right professionals and the right support. It seems to me that Lindsay Clancy did not. At what point she went from being a struggling mum to a killer we may never know, but at some point her troubled mind somehow convinced itself that this was the best course of action.